23 Replies to “TRAVELING with NO license. TAG, registration or insurance HAPPENING NOW !!!”

  1. Everyone – in this video and most of the comments – talks tough about unlicensed driving, but it's illegal and even the US Supreme Court has upheld driver license laws – even for 'noncommercial' motoring. It seems like a lot of people are gonna learn this the hard way.

  2. I've paid for insurance for 25 years , never once in an accident , regardless of fault . can I have that money back . where does it go ? sounds like some sort of racket . lol

  3. Tricky Legalese. Rights Protection is far more important than law-enforcement especially when there is no injury to person or property which is legalese definition of Crime.
    One ought to be at liberty to do whatsoever they need do so long as they don't infringing on the rights of others rondo the same.

  4. Call the "boots on the ground" what they are… liars, pirates, extortionists, and manstealers. Driving is defined as "transport of persons or property." "Transport" is commercial carriage. Travelling as a private motorist is not driving. Driving is a privilege. Travel is a right.

  5. Why do u think they require insurance??? Because they want u to spend money for nothing? No dumb ass!!! It's to protect u , what happens u hit someone and total out there car? And u have no insurance? Well for 1 you'll get sued probably will be paying the car u totaled for the rest of ur life. U people are well beyond retarded

  6. The courts are ran by corporations! The act of 1871 made THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA a corporate owned entity.. NO COURTS HAVE ANY JURISDICTION EXCEPT IN D.C
    that's why judges rule from the bench which means for the banks.. When fools contract with the DMV they voluntarily CONSENT to the terms and conditions… WHICH AREN'T FULLY ENCLOSED TO THE IGNORANT MASSES… WAKE UP PEOPLE. IT A CALLED MARITIME ADMIRALTY LAW… WHICH DOESN'T PERTAIN TO THE CONSTITUTION LAW OF THE LAND.. WE PLAY TENNIS AT THE COURT IT'S A RACKET.. THE JUDGE WEARS BLACK AND WHITE BECAUSE HE IS THE REFEREE..

  7. Yes that is right, the corrupt government twisted and corrupted the "law" the ones that should be paying is ll government vehicles as they are a corporation. Same goes for the "laws" statutes codes regulations ect.. Are for government employees or in Washington DC

  8. I recently was pulled over and had no proof of insurance and no registration and now I have to go to court over the ticket. I need help on this I’m afraid of going to jail.

  9. You must be God yourself to be accident proof. If you damage another car and you are at fault, will you make the repairs yourself. There must be police and court to determine who will pay. Whether it is driving or travelling you are a public danger, Your constitution must be amended in order to protect abiding citizens against dangerous lunatics like yourself. I sincerely wish that you will soon be involved in a grave accident with another fool like yourself. You are a public danger. You should not be allowed to travel except on your private property.

  10. It's all good until a drunk driver with a suspended license runs into someone without any insurance while injuring their children. You DON'T have a right to drive without a license or insurance…traveling or not. GROW UP!

  11. Corpus Juris Secundum (CJS), Volume 7, Section 4, Attorney & client:
    The attorney's first duty is to the courts and the public, not to the client, and wherever the duties to his client conflict with those he owes as an officer of the court in the administration of justice, the former must yield to the latter. Clients are also called "wards" of the court in regard to their relationship with their attorneys.
    Corpus Juris Secundum assumes courts will operate in a lawful manner. If the accused makes this assumption, he may learn, to his detriment, through experience, that certain questions of law, including the question of personal jurisdiction, may never be raised and addressed, especially when the accused is represented by the bar. (Sometimes licensed counsel appears to take on the characteristics of a fox guarding the hen house.)
    Jurisdiction, once challenged, is to be proven, not by the court, but by the party attempting to assert jurisdiction. The burden of proof of jurisdiction lies with the asserter. The court is only to rule on the sufficiency of the proof tendered. See, McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 298 U.S. 178 (1936). The origins of this doctrine of law may be found in MAXFIELD v. LEVY, 4 U.S. 330 (1797), 4 U.S. 330 (Dall.) 2 Dall. 381 2 U.S. 381 1 L.Ed. 424

    See how this Corruption Corporations crap got started.

    https://youtu.be/iYO_gK3P2ls

  12. Also guys your can report these unruly DMV of every state to the Federal Trade Commission that has authority of all web sites in Commerce in the USA. Including these liars of DMV. IF you contact the FTC get a case number so you have Evidence of DMV corruption and your reporting it. The number for reporting is online.

  13. Got pulled over doing 57 in a 35, questionable to me, in a registered, proper tagged, insured motor vehicle, ticket, court, infraction deferral program for $170, which means give me some money, don't let me see you for 6 months and we will forget this. Oops for driving someone's vehicle. I'll take my automobile from here out.

Comments are closed.